The cursor blinks. It’s mocking you. Tab one: Confluence, a search for ‘Project Nightingale Onboarding’ returns 42 irrelevant pages from 2012. Tab two: The new SharePoint migration, which asks for an authenticator app you haven’t used in months. Tab three: Google Drive. You type the keywords again, slowly, as if enunciating for a stubborn child. Nothing. You know the document exists. You saw it once, in a meeting, a fleeting glimpse on a shared screen. It holds the answer to the one question blocking your entire week.
Finally, defeated, you lean back and Slack the one person who’s been here longer than the potted plants. A flurry of dots appears, then vanishes, then reappears. ‘Oh yeah,’ the message finally reads. ‘That’s the Nightingale Protocol. Bob had that on his local drive. He left in 2019.’ And there it is. The digital ghost town. The answer is three feet from where you’re sitting, locked in the fossilized hard drive of a dead laptop, in a storage closet where the key was last seen by a man named Bob who now sells artisanal cheese 2,000 miles away.
This isn’t a technical problem. This is a human problem disguised as a technical one.
We call it ‘information siloing’ or ‘knowledge management failure,’ but that’s too clean. It’s hoarding. And we pretend it’s an accident, a byproduct of messy growth and mismatched systems. I used to believe that. I used to think people were just disorganized, that companies were just bad at creating wikis. But that’s a dangerously naive view of how power and security actually work inside a group of anxious primates.
Consider Indigo A.-M.
She’s a wind turbine technician. When she’s 232 feet in the air, hanging from a harness in a 12-mile-per-hour wind, she needs to know the precise torque sequence for the blade bolts. Not a guess. Not ‘what we did last time.’ She needs the engineering spec updated for the new composite materials introduced in Q2 of 2022. That information exists. It was in a detailed report following a stress test analysis. But the engineer who wrote it, a brilliant man named Suresh, saved it in a sub-folder of a sub-folder on a server that was supposed to be decommissioned two years ago. The only person with the access path is on paternity leave.
The consequences of this invisible failure aren’t a delayed marketing campaign; they’re catastrophic structural failure over the North Sea.
It’s the single biggest drain on productivity, and it never shows up on a balance sheet.
The Hidden Cost
We calculate the cost of software licenses and employee salaries, but we never calculate the 2,232 collective hours a year our teams spend just looking for things. We don’t measure the morale cost of doing detective work instead of your actual job. I blame the system, the culture that values heroes over repeatable processes, but then I look at my own desktop. It’s a mess. And I have a folder. It’s called ‘WIP,’ and it’s a lie. It contains finished work, documented processes, and clever solutions I haven’t moved to the shared drive yet. Why? I tell myself it’s because they aren’t ‘perfected.’ That’s a lie, too. The truth is, it feels good when someone has to ask me for the answer. It’s a tiny, pathetic little hit of validation. I rail against the hoarders, and I am one of them.
just looking for things
An Oddly Universal Problem
It’s an oddly universal problem. You can see it everywhere, once you start looking. The organizational drag of lost information impacts every single industry, from heavy engineering to the most seemingly simple consumer goods. You’d think designing something like Infant clothing nz would be straightforward, but the institutional knowledge required is immense. Where are the material safety reports from the 2022 dye batch? What was the feedback from the parent focus group about snap placement from two years ago? Is the sizing chart based on the WHO growth data or a proprietary model developed by a designer who left the company 12 months ago? If that data is on ‘Bob’s local drive,’ you’re not just inefficient; you’re flying blind, relearning expensive lessons every product cycle.
Changing the Incentive Structure
This isn’t about creating the perfect, all-knowing wiki that everyone magically updates. That’s a technocratic fantasy. It’s about changing the incentive structure. What if being an incredible documenter and sharer was a core metric for promotion? What if, instead of celebrating the person who single-handedly saved the project at the last minute (with knowledge only they possessed), we celebrated the team whose project went smoothly because nothing was ever dependent on one person? It requires a fundamental shift from valuing individual indispensability to valuing collective resilience.
👤
Single point of failure, hoarded knowledge.
→
Shift
→
👥
👥
Shared responsibility, distributed knowledge.
Take the First Step
The first step isn’t a new piece of software. It’s admitting you have a ‘WIP’ folder full of lies, just like I do. It’s grabbing one file from it, just one, and moving it to the shared drive where it belongs. It’s a small, quiet act of trusting your colleagues more than you trust your own manufactured indispensability.